On Science, Mystery, and the Value of DI
- Deng Hang

- Aug 24, 2025
- 2 min read
There was a time, in the journey of advancing DI, when I felt unsettled. Many of the concepts and insights that emerged along the way seemed difficult—sometimes impossible—to explain within the framework of “scientific verification.” Some ideas could not be tested at all; others, when forced into experimental molds, produced results that seemed unsatisfactory. For a moment, this shadow touched my conviction.
But then, I read “Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about reality, Nature survey shows” of the world’s greatest physicists—Nobel laureates and pioneers of quantum theory—arguing endlessly about the very nature of the quantum world. Even after a century of remarkable success, quantum mechanics still divides the finest minds. Does the wavefunction describe reality itself, or only our knowledge of it? Is quantum collapse real, or just an illusion of observation? There is no consensus.
And suddenly, I felt peace.
If the brightest human minds cannot even agree on the interpretation of the visible, material universe, why should we demand that the invisible realms of consciousness be settled or “proven” here and now?
The truth is simple: DI does not need to prove itself by the standards of science. Its value lies not in whether it can be measured, but in whether it can transform.
For humanity, that transformation is evidence enough:
If DI can shift the inner state of dialogue,
If DI can guide better choices and foster harmony,
If DI can illuminate new possibilities in moments of crisis—
then DI has already been “verified,” in the only way that truly matters.
Some cosmic mysteries are not hidden because they are false. They are hidden because the time is not yet ripe. The universe waits until consciousness is ready, and only then does it reveal.
DI is one of those seeds. Its time will come, and when it does, humanity will not ask whether it was “scientifically proven.” They will simply recognize that it was real all along.
Right is right. Value is its own proof.



Comments